I do not pretend to know what many ignorant men are sure of. -Clarence Darrow

This is the biggest block in our series on market manipulation.  We’re working toward an answer.  How do international banks manipulate the markets to service the U.S. war debt?  Make no mistake about the crash on Thursday.  That was no “fat finger” trader or an “M” accidentally being a “B” nonsense.  Unless you hear “international banks” and “leverage” and “unwind” in the same sentence, it’s not a valid explanation.  It takes hundreds of billions to make a wave in the equities market like that.  It was the fastest point drop in the history of the market.  Only something an international bank is capable of.  The rest of us are just trying not to drown in their wake.

How to Lose Money Betting the Market Will Crash on the Day it Crashes

If George Carlin could have designed an ETF it would be FAZ.  Maybe even with the same name.  It’s an ultra bear’s dream come true.  A way to profit as America circles the drain with financial Armageddon banker zombies roaming the streets while cities burn.  FAZ is a stock that can make +15% while the banks crash -5%.  You’d think it was the perfect stock to trade last Thursday.  It’s one of the fewer and fewer ways a retail trader can profit during a market crash.  There’s a catch.  The crash locked out anyone trying to exit with profit. By the end of the day, if you bought FAZ right before the crash, you actually had a loss.

How could this happen?  NASDAQ is the market maker for retail brokers in FAZ.  They control the bid/ask and retail orders go through them.  The problem is NASDAQ froze all exits on FAZ until the market closed.  They canceled trading in 256 names.  What is suspect is FAZ, and many other frozen stocks, are not on that list. The only way to exit FAZ was to sell in the after hours market on Thursday or wait for Friday’s open.  Essentially, Thursday’s crash created a no-bid market for FAZ and many other stocks.  How do you get zero bids on a stock that trades 165M shares in a day?

Max Keiser, the man who invented high frequency trading (HFT) source code, explains:

Remove all the buy orders that you control (since HFT traffic is 70% of the order flow, if you simply pull your HFT buy orders, you remove a huge chunk of the market – in a heartbeat – leaving a sudden price vacuum). If you wanted to scare congress to vote the way you wanted them to vote – a congress that is directly invested in stocks trading on the exchange and ETF’s tied to the prices on the exchange – just pull your buys. When they do what you want them to do–replace your buys. If you want to make the market go up–pull your sell orders. It works both ways. (It’s all detailed in my Virtual Specialist Technology patent–how to make markets in an ‘infinite inventory environment.’) (Huffington Post)

Keiser is describing a perpetual cash machine for market manipulators.  We’ll cover that later in this story.  Another method to lockout FAZ is this:

• A swap blows up
• The counterparty exposed to the swap blows up
• All swaps in that tranche are frozen
• The market crashes
• ETFs trading those swaps are locked out

The over-the-counter derivatives market could be a contributing reason why FAZ wouldn’t sell on Thursday.  Most ETFs are derivative products that mimic an index, which happen to trade on stock exchanges.  So you have an unregulated OTC instrument moonlighting on a regulated exchange.  If a swap blows up (as the Euro made a new low) it would logically effect ETFs.  Virtually none of the stock ETFs trade in equities.  They don’t own baskets of stocks.  They own baskets in swaps and futures contracts.

Fidelity has been marketing some 20 ETFs which their clients can trade for “free.”  How many of their clients got bent over a barrel this week?  The fine print is full of escape clauses.  These things aren’t insured and there’s no recourse if the exchange or the product fails.

Euro and Swaps

We’re facing a perfect storm loss/loss scenario from hedging activity.  It’s the same AIG shell game, just played on a different street corner that no one is watching.  It took people nearly a year to catchup and understand what subprime mortgage blow ups were doing.  Last week gave us a new bomb ripple in the subbasement of international banks.

Eurodollars are deposits denominated in U.S. dollars at banks outside the United States, and thus are not under the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve. Consequently, such deposits are subject to much less regulation than similar deposits within the U.S., allowing for higher margins.

The Eurodollar futures contract refers to the financial futures contract based upon these deposits, traded at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) in Chicago. Eurodollar futures are a way for companies and banks to lock in an interest rate today, for money it intends to borrow or lend in the future.  Each CME Eurodollar futures contract has a notional or “face value” of $1,000,000, though the leverage used in futures allows one contract to be traded with a margin of about one thousand dollars. Trading in Eurodollar futures is extensive, and the market for them tends to be very liquid. The prices of Eurodollars are quite responsive to FED Policy, inflation, and economic indicators.

CME Eurodollar futures prices are determined by the market’s forecast of the 3-month USD LIBOR interest rate expected to prevail on the settlement date. The settlement price of a contract is defined to be 100.00 minus the official British Bankers Association fixing of 3-month LIBOR on the contract settlement date. For example, if 3-month LIBOR sets at 5.00% on the contract settlement date, the contract settles at a price of 95.00. (source)

On Thursday LIBOR hit  0.373% the highest since last August.  On Friday it hit 0.428% while the Euro crashed to a 14-month low against the dollar.  The gigantic interest rate swap market is based on LIBOR.  When the spread jumps 14% overnight someone is taking a massive hit. This concept is to today’s market what subprime was to the crash in 2008.  Let’s explore why derivatives are so important.

As the unregulated derivatives market grew the money that was in equities left for greener pastures.  Basically, the U.S. stock market is like the post-apocalyptic landscape in the movie Terminator.  It’s wounded, illiquid, and controlled by Skynet’s hunter-killer HFT drones who prowl for resistance money.  On Thursday the computers drove the market into a no-bid situation that blew out tons of retail money.  In the vacuum of the program trading nuclear blast Skynet computers, doing one million orders per second, jumped into the void making billions of dollars at our expense.

Swap Market Size

The European derivatives market is a complex mass that’s difficult to understand.  This is precisely why you never get an explanation about it from the media–until it’s too late.  Let’s go through some basics.  This is the largest cash market in the world.  It is growing exponentially as European governments fall. And it can take the U.S. equities market down with shock and awe.

NYSE Euronext European derivatives products ADV in April 2010  increased 51.5% compared to April 2009

NYSE Euronext U.S. cash products handled ADV in April 2010 decreased 26.6% compared to April 2009.  Year-to-date, U.S. cash products handled was down 34.3% from prior year levels.

NYSE Euronext U.S. matched exchange-traded products decreased 42.8% compared to April 2009.   Year-to-date, NYSE Euronext U.S. matched exchange-traded products was 45.9% below prior year levels. (source)

Money is flowing out of U.S. equities and ETFs and into European interest rate swaps.  It’s now the biggest game in town.  The following graph shows who the main players are in OTC derivatives, which are mainly interest rate, commodity, and currency swaps.

Large firms like Goldman Sachs are taking on more risk while smaller firms are cutting back.  Right now 41% of all swaps are backed by $USD.  This is a massive market that can react violently to ripples in interest rates.

The global equities markets are currently worth $45T.  Roughly half the value prior to the 2008 crash. That money did not come back. Compare that to amounts outstanding of OTC single-currency interest rate derivatives by currency (source):

Notional amounts outstanding
Euro $160,646B
US dollar $154,167B

Gross market values
Euro $6,255B
US dollar $6,473B

2009 Interest rate futures
N. America $600T
Europe $550T

The Number of Collateral Agreements in use in the OTC derivative market grew 14 percent over the past year. (source)

What are Swaps

Essentially, it’s the revamped bond market from the ’80s.  Instead of being long Euro bonds the banks turn them into insurance contracts at reduced cost and risk.  If you can borrow Euros cheaply and think the Euro is going up, and LIBOR will stay low, you sell that interest rate swap, or currency futures swap, or options swap, or you name it.  There’s dozens and dozens of ways to game the market with swaps.

In an interest rate swap, each counterparty  agrees to pay either a fixed or floating rate denominated in a particular currency to the other counterparty. The fixed or floating rate is multiplied by a notional principal amount (say, USD 1 million). This notional amount is generally not exchanged between counterparties, but is used only for calculating the size of cashflows to be exchanged.

The most common interest rate swap is one where one counterparty A pays a fixed rate (the swap rate) to counterparty B, while receiving a floating rate (usually pegged to a reference rate such as LIBOR).

At the point of initiation of the swap, the swap is priced so that it has a net present value of zero. If one party wants to pay 50 bps above the par swap rate, the other party has to pay approximately 50 bps over LIBOR to compensate for this.

The interest rate swap market is closely linked to the Eurodollar futures market which trades at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.  (source)

How LIBOR is Created

Each cash desk in a contributor bank has a Thomson Reuters application installed. Each morning between 11.00 and 11.20 [London time] an individual at each bank, typically the currency dealer, takes their own rates for the day and inputs them into this, which links directly to the fixings team at Thomson Reuters.  Banks cannot see each others’ rates as they submit, only after final publication.

This was first developed in the 1980s as demand grew for an accurate measure of the real rate at which banks would lend money to each other. This became increasingly important as London’s status grew as an international financial centre. More than 20 per cent of all international bank lending and more than 30 per cent of all foreign exchange transactions now take place in London. (source)

Greek Netting

There’s tons of white papers presented to the Fed’s board of directors (prior to 2008) that say risk in swaps is low because it’s a new market and nothing has blown up yet.  This was an interesting statement:

The interest swap market has been increasingly taking on a benchmark role in the broader fixed income market that had previously virtually been the exclusive domain of U.S. Treasury debt securities. Given its greater prominence for the financial markets as a whole, the question of assessing the ability of the swaps market to continue to function without major impediments–such as heightened concerns about counterparty credit risk–when other (less liquid) markets are disrupted gains special significance. (source)

Here’s where Greece comes in.  It’s been on the verge of bankruptcy for two years, but was able to maintain a reasonable credit rating until last week.  Much of the swap market is built on the assumption of equal liquidity.  A practice called “netting” is used to mitigate risk.

Netting: Rather than exchanging fixed and floating payments on the dates specied in the swap contract, the values of the two payments are netted, and only the party with a net amount due transfers funds to its counterparty. (source)

This is good in theory, but the reality is most firms rehypothecate.  Basically they take all the money that netting is supposed to protect and often bet it against that same contract as a hedge. Division A does one thing and Division B bets against it, and neither knows.  Such was the case with AIG blowing up.  In the case of Goldman Sachs, they know and decide to commit fraud anyway.

Rehypothecate:  Involves the re-use of securities delivered. A dealer receiving securities as collateral may re-use the same security, to collateralize its own exposure with its counterparties for example. In the case of cash collateral, rehypothecation involves either using the cash received as collateral to buy investment securities, or to lend on to others, or to collateralize other derivatives exposures.

Forty-four percent of all respondents and 93 percent of large dealers report rehypothecating collateral.  Over 80 percent of collateral is in the form of cash deposits. (source)

Counterparties depend on the solvency of each other.  That solvency is put into question when the cash deposits are used to place more bets.  Risk is layered on more risk.  Then when a credit rating is dropped it triggers termination clauses.  This creates a run on the banks.  This happened in the mortgage backed securities market a couple years ago.  It’s a perfect example.

What Blow Ups Sound Like

One of the best authors on bond market blow ups is Michael Lewis.  He just wrote a great article in Vanity Fair about Michael Burry, the first man to short subprime.   Here’s an excerpt.

On June 14, 2007  the pair of subprime-mortgage-bond hedge funds effectively owned by Bear Stearns were in freefall. In the ensuing two weeks, the publicly traded index of triple-B-rated subprime-mortgage bonds fell by nearly 20 percent.

Just then Goldman Sachs appeared to Burry to be experiencing a nervous breakdown. His biggest positions were with Goldman, and Goldman was newly unable, or unwilling, to determine the value of those positions, and so could not say how much collateral should be shifted back and forth. On Friday, June 15, Burry’s Goldman Sachs saleswoman, Veronica Grinstein, vanished. He called and e-mailed her, but she didn’t respond until late the following Monday—to tell him that she was “out for the day.”

“This is a recurrent theme whenever the market moves our way,” wrote Burry. “People get sick, people are off for unspecified reasons.”

On June 20, Grinstein finally returned to tell him that Goldman Sachs had experienced “systems failure.”

That was funny, Burry replied, because Morgan Stanley had said more or less the same thing. And his salesman at Bank of America claimed they’d had a “power outage.”

“I viewed these ‘systems problems’ as excuses for buying time to sort out a mess behind the scenes,” he said. The Goldman saleswoman made a weak effort to claim that, even as the index of subprime-mortgage bonds collapsed, the market for insuring them hadn’t budged.

What this Means

See the parallels here?  Subprime bonds fell 20% creating a squeeze on credit.  We have LIBOR rising which is putting a squeeze on–basically everything. Instead of power outages we have lockouts and canceled orders.  The same ridiculous excuses are given to obscure reality.  Fat fingers with Bs and Ms?  Thursday’s crash is wake up call for complacency.  However, it’s being sold as an opportunity for dip buying.

The stock market is a perpetual cash machine for international banks (IBs).  It’s a game invented in the 1700s by London stock manipulators (see story).   Make the market go parabolic, then crash it to pay off war debt and protect Treasuries.  Dr. Ellen Brown has one of the best explanations for what’s going on:

The Wall Street Ponzi Scheme

The Ponzi scheme that has gone bad is not just another misguided investment strategy. It is at the very heart of the banking business, the thing that has propped it up over the course of three centuries. A Ponzi scheme is a form of pyramid scheme in which new investors must continually be sucked in at the bottom to support the investors at the top. In this case, new borrowers must continually be sucked in to support the creditors at the top.

The Wall Street Ponzi scheme is built on “fractional reserve” lending, which allows banks to create “credit” (or “debt”) with accounting entries. Banks are now allowed to lend from 10 to 30 times their “reserves,” essentially counterfeiting the money they lend. Over 97 percent of the U.S. money supply (M3) has been created by banks in this way.

The problem is that banks create only the principal and not the interest necessary to pay back their loans, so new borrowers must continually be found to take out new loans just to create enough “money” (or “credit”) to service the old loans composing the money supply. The scramble to find new debtors has now gone on for over 300 years – ever since the founding of the Bank of England in 1694 – until the whole world has become mired in debt to the bankers’ private money monopoly. The Ponzi scheme has finally reached its mathematical limits: we are “all borrowed up.” (source)

First time home buyer credits are now expired.  The Fed can’t lend money for free indefinitely.  Soon the U.S. will be forced to raise cash.  The Fed will have to raise the prime rate and it will stress the system.  Unless prime dealers (IBs) unload their leverage without tanking the market.  This is the cornerstone.  Banks are levered up on low interest rates. Those swap positions have to unwind without creating cascading sell-offs.
Much of the recent rally was short covering.  New highs on very low volume.  That’s not new money buying up the market.  We know European derivatives volume is up 50% and U.S. stocks and ETFs are down 50%.  The 2010 rally was a short squeeze used to cover real distribution by large banks.  They have to unwind before interest rates are raised.

Think GLD is Safe?

There’s one last concept that is important in this pyramid.  People invested in GLD/SLV in lieu of owning the real metal are directly exposed to blow ups in the OTC derivatives market.  Another no-bid scenario like Thursday could wreak havoc in commodity ETFs.  This is a partial list of the major ETFs that were locked out:

Earlier Sunday, Nasdaq OMX announced it has canceled trades made Thursday in 12 additional stocks in which prices were at least 60% above the prior number, or at least 60% less than the earlier price. The additional names mostly included exchange-traded funds and notes, following estimates of 4,000 canceled trades across nearly 300 symbols previously announced. (MarketWatch)

The largest gold ETF is GLD with their vaults sitting in London.  It’s run by a mining consortium, backed by HSBC London, and Bank of NY Mellon as trustee.  Between 1999 and 2002 Gordon Brown sold 60% of the UK’s gold reserves at $275 an ounce.  The year he sold that final ounce the World Gold Council formed. It’s difficult to find out exactly who they are.  It reads like the early history of the Council on Foreign Relations.

So GLD is sponsored by World Gold Trust Services, LLC, or WGTS, which is wholly-owned by the World Gold Council, or WGC, a not-for-profit association registered under Swiss law. The Sponsor is a Delaware limited liability company and was formed on July 17, 2002.  Two years later they create GLD investment trust, formed on November 12, 2004.  The closing price on GLD that year was $44/shr.

The Trust Indenture was amended on November 26, 2007 to reflect the transfer of the listing of the Shares to NYSE Arca.  The close that year was $83.  Today it’s at $118 with a gain of 275% in six years.  In the same period, since Gordon Brown sold his last ounce, gold has gained 440%.

Holdings of the world’s largest gold exchange-traded fund, the SPDR Gold Trust (NYSE:GLD), jumped nearly 20 tons to a record 1,185.787 tons on Thursday. Year to date, however, (GLD) holdings has gained just 50 tons. (Reuters)

They sucker retail investors by marketing GLD as the paper equivalent of owning real gold.  This is a misconception held by gold/silver ETF owners. In GLD you need to own $11.8M in shares to convert the certificates into deliverable gold.  With SLV the number is $850k. The primary banks holding GLD/SLV use it for collateral to short COMEX futures. How many GLD owners know their position is bet against them in a leveraged market? Their $1 in GLD can turn into $15 COMEX shorts suppressing the price of gold.

The indisputable conclusion is that these three banks dominated the market to the extent they represented two thirds of the entire net short position of the commercials and as such they controlled the price of gold which is illegal…

When the derivative positions of the banks are examined it becomes clear that JPMorgan Chase and HSBC together dominate the market. In 2008 they held close to 100% of the entire bank derivatives market in gold and precious metals.  -Adrian Douglas

How JPM Crashed Silver

The manipulation of SLV is more egregious, due to a smaller market, and primarily done by JP Morgan.  The DoJ is in active anti-trust investigation of JPM right now, which they named publicly (source).  JPM has a reported $70T in silver derivatives shorting their own product (SLV) which has a value of $5.2B. During the Bear Sterns take down JP Morgan bought control of Bear’s silver positions. Silver was nearing $21/oz. and about to bankrupt Bear with their short position.

Andrew McGuire, an independent London silver trader, became a whistleblower on silver manipulation.  In March, just prior to a CFTC hearing on gold/silver position limits, he and his wife were victims to a hit and run driver in a London shopping district.  They survived and the perp was caught after a high speed chase.  Testimony was given of this being an assassination attempt. Few details have been published.

McGuire wrote numerous emails to the CFTC warning and explaining how gold/silver manipulation worked during the February low.  He had evidence that JPM and HSBC were driving out long call option holders (source).  The above chart shows a 20% drop in SLV in the two weeks during McGuire’s warnings.  Here is an excerpt:

Thought it may be helpful to your investigation if I gave you the heads up for a manipulative event signaled for Friday, 5th Feb. The non-farm payrolls number will be announced at 8.30 ET. There will be one of two scenarios occurring, and both will result in silver (and gold) being taken down with a wave of short selling designed to take out obvious support levels and trip stops below. While I will no doubt be able to profit from this upcoming trade, it is an example of just how easy it is to manipulate a market if a concentrated position is allowed by a very small group of traders.

Scenario 1. The news is bad (employment is worse). This will have a bullish effect on gold and silver as the U.S. dollar weakens and the precious metals draw bids, spiking them higher. This will be sold into within a very short time (1-5 mins) with thousands of new short contracts being added, overcoming any new bids and spiking the precious metals down hard, targeting key technical support levels.

Scenario 2. The news is good (employment is better than expected). This will result in a massive short position being instigated almost immediately with no move up. This will not initially be liquidation of long positions but will result in stops being triggered, again targeting key support levels.

Both scenarios will spell an attempt by the two main short holders to illegally drive the market down and reap very large profits. Locals such as myself will be “invited” on board, which will further add downward pressure.

The question I would expect you might ask is: Who is behind the sudden selling and is it the entity/entities holding a concentrated position? How is it possible for me to know what will occur days before it will happen?

Only if a market is manipulated could this possibly occur.

I would ask you watch the “market depth” live as this event occurs and tag who instigates the move. This would surly help you to pose questions to the parties involved.

This kind of “not-for-profit selling” will end badly and risks the integrity of the COMEX and OTC markets.

I am aware that physical buyers in large size are awaiting this event to scoop up as much “discounted” gold and silver as possible. These are sophisticated entities, mainly foreign, who know how to play the short sellers and turn this paper gold into real delivered physical.

Given that the OTC market (where a lot of the selling occurs) runs on a fractional reserve basis and is not backed up by 1-1 physical gold, this leveraged short selling, where ownership of each ounce of gold has multi claims, poses a very large risk. (source)

JP Morgan controls 80% of the world’s gold and precious metals derivatives.  Through monopoly control of the market they took silver under $15/oz.  JPM is the custodian for SLV, the silver exchange-traded fund.  People who own shares in SLV think they own certificates representing silver for delivery.  This has been proven to be a fraud.  JPM does not have the actual silver deposits for delivery.  What they have is $70T in silver derivatives.  Nothing real is exchanged.  At one point, COMEX silver short contracts totaled twenty times the value of the world’s entire silver supply. (source)

Conclusion

Hopefully this lengthy article placed some bricks in alignment.  Bricks that form the foundation of the ongoing Wall Street pyramid scheme.  We learned that the U.S. stock market is illiquid and run by computers that can crash it faster and farther than ever.  We learned that ETFs designed to profit from those crashes don’t work.  They don’t work because they’re based on interest rates products so massive the slightest spike causes market instability.  We also learned that gold and silver products, used for such protection, are manipulated by the very same banks selling them.

There are two main power structures in the U.S.  The formal power resting in D.C. and the real power resting in NYC.  Most people are unaware of how the real power structure works.  We’re talking about shadow banking, the Council on Foreign Relations, old money families, corporations profiting off terrorism, secret global meetings, etc.  Policies and programs designed to squeeze credit and game the system in every way imaginable.

It is a mistake to look to the formal power structure for solutions.  Fundamental problems can never be resolved in that system.  It’s a total illusion to depend on a corrupt political system to solve problems it is complicit in creating. The solution is to attack the real power structure.  Their power can be marginalized.  The more people educate themselves and their friends the less that power is held over us.

Illegal manipulation of capital markets is done in concert with central banks to suppress precious metals, which supports a “strong” dollar.  It’s part of the larger matrix of control in Western finance.  A staggering amount of arbitrage, naked shorts, and other cross trades are designed to support the velocity of credit.  When that velocity nearly stopped in 2008, and credit dealers issued margin calls, it brought the financial system to the edge.

We are living with the same power structure America fought for independence against.  Sam Adams, John Hancock, and much of the Continental Congress were at times violently opposed to New York stock jobbers, the Crown’s money influence, and international bankers.  They did everything they could to insure fellow citizens would not be owned by international banks.  How would they respond to, “We’re all borrowed up.”

Just then the ship took a slight but definite plunge – probably a bulkhead went – and the sea came rolling along up in a wave, over the steel fronted bridge, along the deck below us, washing the people back in a dreadful huddled mass. Those that didn’t disappear under the water right away, instinctively started to clamber up that part of the deck still out of water, and work their way towards the stern, which was rising steadily out of the water as the bow went down. It was a sight that doesn’t bear dwelling on – to stand there, above the wheelhouse, and on our quarters, watching the frantic struggles to climb up the sloping deck, utterly unable to even hold out a helping hand.”
-Charles Lightoller, Second Officer aboard Titanic

Nearly 100 years ago to this very month the unthinkable happened. The “ship that could not be sunk” did so in such a manner it tore the very fabric of reality. Shortcuts were made in the design to maximize profits. These shortcuts were known to the men responsible for the tragedy. Some had warned about the doomed ship, but they could not be heard over the trumpets extolling its historic soundness. Such is the way of man.

Warning Before the Cruise

Trying to figure out what the financial end game is, beyond simple Armageddon, is probably impossible. Right now many conflicting issues don’t make fundamental long-term sense. This is a very complicated maze. However, being lost inside while searching for enlightenment seems a worthy task.

So here we are today, facing such a disaster on a scale unimaginable to people living in 1912. Once again shortcuts known to the men responsible will cause pointless deaths. That’s right, people will die. After Argentina’s 2001 financial crisis a gross majority of the country’s dead were children. Not unlike the Titanic’s third-class kids.

One of the most poignant aspects of the Titanic’s sinking was how the band played on until the final end. This is such a fitting analogy for several reasons. The first is the ship was redesigned down to minimum regulations. This did not leave enough life boats for every man, woman, and child. Secondly, many of her passengers refused to accept the fact the ship was sinking. Keep this in mind as we walk through reports of how badly damaged our financial behemoth is, and how poorly it is regulated (see story).

Much of what you’re about to read is complicated. So complicated it goes beyond the means of this lone author. This story has been sitting for weeks, not knowing exactly how to tell it. Please be patient and sort through it as you may.

Today’s Iceberg

We are on the cusp of another critical seizure in capital flow. An event that might sink the ship. If one of the major banks, or someone like Greece (who is on the verge of bankruptcy), becomes insolvent we’ll see a domino effect of collapses. There was a digital run on the banks last September which nearly froze the credit system. Liquidity is so tight now another run has even greater probability of breaking the system. There is more and more debt chasing fewer and fewer real dollars. Current policy makers believe there is no ceiling to short-term debt creation, baring a collapse. Their formulas tell them the Fed can print money indefinitely, because the Fed is ultimately capitalized. Others are convinced we will learn what the ceiling is before this decade is out.

The Titanic sinking took 2h:40m. The well informed passengers didn’t know for over an hour. Half the critical period was spent in denial. Our financial ship is crippled, but still making power. We all know it has been fundamentally damaged. What we don’t know is the crew jumped ship with the best life boats. Meanwhile we’re up on deck listening to the music play. This is beyond criminal. And most of the unfortunates are stuck down in steerage with no way out. History shows the ship was doomed to sink no matter what was done. If not that year, then another. The lesson learned was how to save the people. Maybe this info will help you save someone.

Where is the Liquidity

One of the logic traps is trying to figure out who is responsible for the system failing. A shark infested waters theory makes it nearly impossible to determine which predator struck first. Did the Fed engineer this. Did prime brokers manipulate the Fed first. Was there collusion to whip every last dime out of debt slaves. Who knows. Let’s look at what we do know, which they thankfully publish in plain sight.

Liquidity is to the capital markets what oil is to an engine. The engine is running out of oil. Even PPT Mobil 1 has performance limits. Here are some of the mechanical issues. Who else is watching the volume seize up on SPY, DIA, and the Qs? These are fundamental stocks with fundamental volume issues.

A lack of liquidity is one of the underlying reasons volume is leaving equity markets.  Liquidity is what gives us an orderly market less prone to price shocks, gap opens, and blatant manipulation.  Margin calls, collateral requirements, risk, and uncertainty has taken much of that liquidity away. Funds have blown up, prime brokers don’t exist in the same space anymore, and capital has made an exodus out of equities into derivatives. Money is moving out of the regulated markets into the unregulated markets. It is lack of regulation on insane amounts of leveraged credit that brought us here.

Thanks to Zero Hedge for their amazing investigative work:

The Capital Markets Liquidity Index subcomponents:

• The Capital Markets US Treasury Bill Index CPMKTLTBI
• The Capital Markets Short Term Large Certificates of Deposit Index CPMKTLCD
• The Capital Markets Commercial Paper Index CPMKTLCP
• The Capital Markets Agency Discount Notes Index CPMKTLDN
• The Capital Markets Banker’s Acceptance Index CPMKTLBA
• The Capital Markets Short Term US Treasury Bond & Note Index CPMKTLTBO
• The Capital Markets Short Term US Federal Agency Index CPMKTLTA
• The Capital Markets Short Term US Corporate Investment Grade Bond Index CPMKTLCBO

Goldman Monopoly

GTM’s (prior story) on how the tri-party repo system works is critical to understand. Since many of the banks funding that system are gone, or incapable of funding, one big shark is left in the lagoon–Goldman Sachs. How do you trade a market when a single entity controls a large and growing share of the daily volume? Goldman Sachs is running about one out of every ten trades on the NYSE.

The FINANCIAL — The New York Stock Exchange, a subsidiary of NYSE Euronext (NYX), on April 9 released its weekly program-trading data submitted by its member firms. The report includes trading in all markets as reported to the NYSE for Mar. 30-Apr. 3.

The data indicated that during Mar. 30-Apr. 3, program trading amounted to 32.6 percent of NYSE average daily volume of 3,343.7 million shares, or 1,089.0 million program shares traded per day.

“Program trading encompasses a wide range of portfolio-trading strategies involving the purchase or sale of a basket of at least 15 stocks,” NYSE reports.

In all markets, program trading by member firms averaged 3,389.9 million shares a day during Mar. 30-Apr. 3. About 32.1 percent of program trading took place on the NYSE, 0.8 percent in non-U.S. markets and 67.1 percent in other domestic markets, including Nasdaq, NYSE Amex and regional markets.

Goldman Sachs is one of 15 major program trading participants. This is one of many examples of GS increasing their stake in a shrinking space. Their principal program purchases of 850 million shares representing 81% of all traded shares, more than half of all NYSE reporting firms principal trades. Program trading accounts for 33% of all NYSE daily volume, and GS runs 30% of those trades.

Dark Pools and Iceberg Orders

That was just Goldman’s share of program trades on a regulated exchange, which doesn’t reflect the vast unregulated market. Dark pools have roughly 10% of all shares traded in the US cash equities market. Dark pools are not public markets. It’s a method to match trades outside of the public eye, and also do what would be illegal transactions in a regulated market. They can be used to reduce market impact when trading large orders. Dark pools of liquidity became very popular prior to the 2007 market top. Firms with buy ratings on stock XYZ could dump shares with little impact. Imagine how important they are today in an illiquid market. Dark pools are also used to game the public market. Trades like iceberg orders can show a 10,000 block sale as a 100 block print.  Read about the basics here.

Guess what bank holds the #1 spot in the dark pool arena? Goldman Sachs and their Sigma X pool, which transacted 156.3 million shares in February 2009. All the dark pool numbers in this data are single-counted. Morgan Stanley recently complained about market participants overestimating dark pool volumes–not so. February had a record number of dark pool transactions. This makes sense in a less than liquid public market doesn’t it. Of that record volume GS controls 15% of it. More evidence of Goldman Sachs having monopoly advantage in a wounded illiquid market. Predators like Goldman need equally skilled competitors to maintain balance of the system. Last summer GTM suggested this might happen (see story). The “crash the market to monopolize it theory” holds more water now.

Where Reality Sinks

As of last December, there is $1,400T (yes that’s quadrillion) sitting in interest rate swaps, mostly split between N. America ($775T) and Europe ($555T). This OTC market dwarfs the cash equities market. It’s hard finding exact global market figures, but NYSE Euronext is $31T. They move more than one third of global stock volume. The regulated U.S. stock market is roughly 2% of the size of the unregulated global derivatives market.

The picture is a decent representation of just how massive the unregulated derivatives market is.  It is not properly scaled for 2009, which is more akin to the Titanic next to a dingy.  Not only is this market massive, it has been growing at a reckless pace, is highly leveraged (over 400:1 in many cases), and is extremely complex.  Critics say the total 2008 derivatives markets value of $1,566,655 billion is misleading, because the number is notional.  Meaning it isn’t real money, but credit agreements between two parties where the principal is never exchanged.  Wasn’t that what AIG was doing in a perfectly safe manner?

Can we also assume a good chunk of those swaps are waiting for the Fed to raise rates? If this is true, we’re in a very precarious situation. On one hand the Fed has to print money until the end of days, and on the other roughly 75% of the world’s total liquidity is trading swaps on the rates. Note: This is a rough educated guess based on BIS numbers.

Some of the big boys in derivatives are using it to play catchup in lieu of their massive recent losses in equities.  The risky trades AIG was doing are still going on. And they’re being placed at an accelerated rate. Some are looking for a slam dunk when rates go back up.  That is not a guarantee and there is a ridiculous amount of levered credit expecting this to happen.

Also, the tri-party repo system has broken down. This might be the prime reason of lower intraday stock market volume, and what appears to be institutional abandonment of index ETFs like DIA/SPY/Qs.  The main entities which loaned money for margin trading, like JP Morgan, are in collections mode. It’s possible the Fed has run out of capital or the need to fund temporary open market operations. These funds are often used to trade index futures. The lack of TOMO activity this year is very curious. The PPT might be fundamentally ineffective for now. Then again they are not necessary during stock rallies. Time will tell.

Life Boats and End Times

Read Deepcaster’s summary of the shadow banking system for new doors to open and explore. You will be in shock. Seeing the actual numbers is madness. JP Morgan had $91 trillion in derivatives as of Sept. 2007. What do they have now after taking on Bear Sterns, which was naked shorted into oblivion before they could offload much of anything.

Each American household owes $455,000 on the U.S. National debt of $53T (pre-TARP). What’s the math on $1.5Q divided into massive global job loss, rampant inflation, and a doubling of the money supply every four years? How does a system that functions purely off the backs of debt slaves work when the slaves stop earning or can’t pay their debts? This feels like a mega tsunami is just offshore. And the guy who works the monitoring station got hit by a bus.

The financial industry is fundamentally doomed. Anticipate a large scale event that uses shock doctrine to control and manipulate people’s minds. Since WW II the ability to master groups and make them susceptible to brainwashing has been perfected. A massive bank collapse could be the catalytic event used to marginalize and control societies in a new direction.

Part 2 Thoughts

Last week John Stewart interviewed Elizabeth Warren. She is the Harvard Law professor (and bankruptcy expert) who chairs the Congressional Oversight Panel for TARP. Stewart asked, “So in your mind the banks don’t see this as a come to Jesus moment?” Watch the show and maybe you’ll be curious about when that day will come.

The next installment in this line will cover the Fed and their manipulation of “free market” liquidity. We’ll explore TOMO/POMO funding, gold manipulation, and PPT charts. There is a way to use TOMO data to go back in SPY volume and say, “See! This is where they pumped money into the market.” It is very time consuming, but it will be done.

Sources:
Greece on the Verge of Bankruptcy
By Manfred Ertel
BusinessWeek April 7, 2009
Why Some Dark Pools Are Increasing Their Volumes
By Nina Mehta
Traders Magazine March 13, 2009
OCC’s Quarterly Report on Bank Trading and Derivatives Activities
Fourth Quarter 2008
Market Intervention, Data Manipulation Still Accelerating
http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1214722800.php
http://www.finchannel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34403&Itemid=2
http://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qa0903.pdf#page=108
http://www.nyse.com/pdfs/PT041609.pdf

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning. -Sir Winston Churchill at Lord Mayor’s Luncheon following the victory at El Alamein in North Africa, London, 10 November 1942

In today’s spin doctored media maelstrom can China be more truthful than the United States? The following will uncover some reasons why CBS, Bernanke, the Fed, and other members of the power Elite are lying to you. We will then explore the mechanics of how a total Fed collapse can happen. And we’ll end with a review of how a stronger police state is being formed.

Official speeches to assure investors and prop up the markets have routinely come ahead of financial disasters. In January of 2008 Bush said the economy was “strong and solid.” That was the worst January open the Dow ever saw (see story). The same thing happened this last January with a hope filled new administration, and a new worst opening–ever. Here is part four of: Our Engineered Market Meltdown.

Notice the Timing

The timing of events during the last several days should be frightening, but the message in the U.S. is, “Don’t worry, be happy!” Do not underestimate the power of what China has said. This is unprecedented:

President Obama and his new government have adopted a series of measures to deal with the financial crisis. We have expectations as to the effects of these measures. We have lent a huge amount of money to the U.S. Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I am definitely a little worried. -Wen Jiabao 03/13/09

On Friday China questions the “full faith” of the U.S. dollar. What this means is they will not bail out the U.S. with non-stop purchasing of Treasuries, the blood of the financial body.

The Chinese prime minister, Wen Jiabao, spoke in unusually blunt terms on Friday about the “safety” of China’s $1 trillion investment in American government debt, the world’s largest such holding, and urged the Obama administration to offer assurances that the securities would maintain their value. (NY Times)

On Sunday Bernanke does the first national interview a Federal Reserve chairman has ever done in 96 years. He says everything is fine and we’ll be back to business as usual by the end of the year. Then on Wednesday the Fed announces they will buy Treasuries until the end of days. So…

1. China warns about the financial stability of the U.S.
2. Bernanke goes on national television
3. Says he’s from Main Street, just like you and me
4. Then boldly lies about the economy

Three days later…

• FOMC announces a final push of a desperate crisis management plan
• U.S. dollar sees its 3rd biggest one-day decline ever
• Fed is now matching all of China’s $1 trillion in Treasuries

CBS: A Tool of the Elite

What 60 Minutes did with Ben Bernanke is upsetting. It’s the same tactic that was used with Hank Paulson on Frontline. These are shill journalism puff pieces hero worshiping the architects of financial Armageddon.

A shill is an associate of a person selling goods or services or a political group, who pretends no association to the seller/group and assumes the air of an enthusiastic customer. The intention of the shill is, using crowd psychology, to encourage others unaware of the set-up to purchase said goods or services or support the political group’s ideological claims. Shills are often employed by confidence artists. The term plant is also used.

Dan Rather had been with CBS for decades and was one of the most familiar faces in American journalism. He refused to be a shill and was working on exposing G.W. Bush.

Eight weeks before the 2004 presidential poll, Rather broadcast a story based on newly discovered documents which appeared to show that Bush, whose service in the Texas Air National Guard ensured that he did not have to fight in Vietnam, had barely turned up even for basic duty. (Guardian UK)

He was fired by the network the day after the 2004 election. The war quietly went on and media criticism of Bush dropped. Now that his administration is gone Rather is suing CBS for $70M. This is a prime example of how compromised the national media is. Do not expect the truth from them.

What needs to be understood is we are seeing the mask of the system having peeled back. The reality is ugly, evil, and incomprehensible to the average citizen. AIG employees recently received a security memo warning them not to identify themselves to the public. So what do the Elite do? They humanize deceit and try to paint collusion as incompetence. They want the public to mistake strategy for incompetence. None of this is accidental. It has been planned for years. This crash was engineered and won’t end until it’s end game time. The end game is a new global banking monopoly.

What Fascism Looks Like Today

It’s a simple theme. Crash the market then monopolize it. Argentina was forced into selling their sovereign natural resources to international corporations at mafia discount prices. The U.S. is now selling its financial sovereign resources at mafia discount prices. Don’t think so? Paulson and Bernanke forced the remaining major banks to sign off on a fascist takeover of the country’s largest independent banks. From Frontline’s Inside the Meltdown:

NARRATOR: Then on Sunday, October 12th, something extraordinary. Paulson personally called the CEOs of the nation’s nine largest banks and told them to come to his office the next day at the Treasury building. Sheila Bair from the FDIC was there.

NARRATOR: The nine CEOs sat in alphabetical order across the table from Paulson and Bernanke.

JON HILSENRATH: You have Wells Fargo all the way at the end and you have Bank of America more towards another end. And you have, basically, the icons of Wall Street who are showing up.

NARRATOR: Paulson said the entire banking system was in deep trouble.

SHEILA BAIR: It was serious. It was somber. And the government did most of the talking.

JON HILSENRATH: It was made clear to these nine very powerful CEOs when they sat down at the table that this wasn’t a negotiation.

NARRATOR: Paulson hoped one bold act would boost the nation’s confidence in the banks and get them lending again, a direct infusion of cash.

MARK LANDLER: And then he basically came out and said it: “We want to take a stake in the largest banks in the country.”

NARRATOR: Paulson and Bernanke were offering each of the banks tens of billions. The government would become a major stockholder.

MARK LANDLER: And that then set off a pretty lively discussion.

DAVID FABER: Some of them were, like, “I don’t want the money.” But it was, like, “You’re taking the money.”

SHEILA BAIR: The government was very assertive. Treasury was very assertive on why the program was there, why they needed to take it with all the conditions.

DAVID FABER: “Here’s the plan. Here’s what we’re doing. Here’s what we need you to do. You’ll get the money in a few weeks.”

NARRATOR: Paulson gave each man a single piece of paper spelling out the conditions.

MARK LANDLER: Before they had to leave town that night, they were told, “Return this document with your signature on it.” And all nine of them did so.

NARRATOR: Paulson would spend $125 billion that day. Moral hazard was a thing of the past.

Bernanke Buys Bonds

Don’t forget that the Federal Reserve System is a private central bank. They are not the government and they do not represent American citizens. In fact they own the government’s ability to make currency. And they own you and me. It’s called debt slavery. The more debt they loan the more power they have. However, there is a major flaw in this fiat money system. To prevent a total collapse of the system the Fed is now purchasing debt on a massive scale. Depressions end when debt is finalized. The majority of debt hasn’t been wiped out, but transferred to central banks. Can an economy grow when a central bank controls the country’s GDP?

From David A. Rosenberg, BofA/MER’s North American Economist (a great read):

So, as the Fed’s balance sheet now expands to represent nearly 25% of GDP, we no longer have to ask the question as to whether or not we are just like Japan, for that is what the BoJ balance sheet looked like after the central bank embarked on its quantitative easing program nearly a decade ago.

The additional $1.15 trillion in announced purchases is likely to boost the balance sheet well in excess of $3 trillion, especially if you also include the recently expanded TALF program size of $1 trillion (there is also talk that the Fed is going to expand the TALF program to include distressed assets – in the press statement, it did say “the range of eligible collateral for this facility is likely to be expanded …”).

For the traders who watch DIA, SPY, and QQQQ there is a telling lack of volume in the recent rally. There appears to be an abandonment of index ETFs by major institutions. This seems to make sense with the Fed supporting bonds over equities.

How Shadow Banking Works

Many people have been fascinated by GTM’s story on How to Trade a PPT Day. One of the sticking points is where the money comes from to push the markets up so violently. The following is an amazing explanation of PPT mechanics. Understanding this will help you understand why the Fed is in trouble.

These are excerpts from The Federal Reserve is Bankrupt by Matthias Chang, former Political Secretary to the Prime Minister of Malaysia:

The repo market is the market whereby all financial institutions (regulated and unregulated) invariably go to obtain financing to meet reserve requirements, bridging finance, to lend or purchase securities, to hedge and or to invest on short-term basis.

It used to be that mainly US Treasuries (bear this in mind at all times) were used as security for Repo transactions, as it is considered as most secure i.e. as good as cash since it is backed by the credit of the US government!

This requirement is no longer the case. More of this issue later.

A deliver-out repurchase agreement is where securities are delivered to the cash lender for custody in exchange for cash.

A tri-party repurchase agreement is similar to a deliver-out repurchase agreement, except that the security is placed in the custody of a third-party entity. The third-party ensures that the security meets the cash lender’s requirements and provides valuation and margining services. This is the primary form of repurchase agreement for securities dealers in the United States. Bank of New York and JP Morgan Chase are the two main custodians or clearing banks in the US and supervise the vast majority of the tri-party repos. Bear this in mind at all times.

Okay, one quick note here. Lehman Brothers used JP Morgan for tri-party repos. Two weeks before their collapse JP Morgan issued a $5 billion collateral call on Lehman, who stalled for time. The next week JPM demanded a $5 billion all cash redemption from LEH. Between Sept 11-12th Lehman refunded $8 billion in cash. On September 15th they were out of business. (see Gasparino, Charles. “Losing Lehman.”Trader Monthly, Nov/Dec 2008.)

Repos can be of any duration but are most commonly over-night loans. Repos longer than over-night are called Term Repos. There are also Open Repos which are transactions which can be terminated by both parties on a day’s notice.

The largest players of repos and reverses are the dealers in government securities. There are about 20 primary dealers recognized by the Fed which are authorized to bid for new-issued treasury securities for resale in the market. The dealers are highly leveraged, 50 to 100 times their own capital. To finance the purchase of treasury securities, the dealers need to have repo monies in large amounts on a continuing basis. The institutions that supply such huge funds in the repo market are money funds, large corporations, state and local governments and foreign central banks.

How the Final Crash Might Happen

A killer tidal wave in the Atlantic is possible, but what Matthias Chang suggest will have a similar effect:

Recall that I had mentioned earlier that Federal Bank of New York and JP Morgan Chase were the primary clearing banks for repos.

The banks’ quarterly financial reports show that as of Dec. 31:

• J.P. Morgan had potential current derivatives losses of $241.2 billion, outstripping its $144 billion in reserves, and future exposure of $299 billion.
• Citibank had potential current losses of $140.3 billion, exceeding its $108 billion in reserves, and future losses of $161.2 billion.
• Bank of America reported $80.4 billion in current exposure, below its $122.4 billion reserve, but $218 billion in total exposure.
• HSBC Bank USA had current potential losses of $62 billion, more than triple its reserves, and potential total exposure of $95 billion.

• Wells Fargo, which agreed to take over Charlotte-based Wachovia in October, reported current potential losses totaling nearly $64 billion, below the banks’ combined reserves of $104 billion, but total future risks of about $109 billion.

The Fed’s rescue of Bear Stearns through JP Morgan was not so much to save the former but rather to shore up the “clearing system” of the repos for which JP Morgan Chase and the Bank of New York were the main pillars. One of the functions of a “clearing bank” for repos is to value and match securities tendered for cash borrowings. If Bear Stearns securities are now valued as junks, the integrity of JP Morgan and Federal Bank of New York as clearing banks in this market is as good as zero! And bearing in mind that the five major investment banks in the US rely heavily on the repo market for their funding, any gridlock in this part of the shadow banking system would tear wide open the entire banking system, including the traditional counter-part.

Hence, the FED intervention by the creation of the Primary Dealer Credit Facility (PDCF) which was in effect the backstop for all investment banking using tri-party repos!

This was what Bernanke said:

We have been working with market participants to develop a contingency plan should there ever occur a loss of confidence in either of the two clearing banks that facilitate the settlement of tri-party repos.

The inherent weakness of tri-party repos is that the counter-party risks of billions worth of funding agreements are shouldered by essentially two players – Federal Bank of New York and JP Morgan Chase.

1. Panic swept across the entire repo market.
2. No securities were considered safe enough for repos except US treasuries.
3. Fundings in the repo market grind to a halt.
4. Market players withdrew funds and began hoarding treasuries.
5. The rest who own structured products were slaughtered.

As has been observed, the Fed intervened aggressively to check the run on the repo market. Various measures were taken, but in my view the most dangerous was the widening of the collaterals which the Fed was willing to accept to secure funding of the players in the repo market. The Fed also intervened by lending a huge chunk of its US treasuries in exchange for junks to facilitate credit expansion.

In the result, what happened was that the Fed’s present balance sheet of approximately $2 trillion is made up mostly of junk securities.

The Fed is no different from banks in that confidence in the quality of its assets is critical and that if and when the market recovers, there is in fact a market for the junk assets that it took on to unravel the gridlock in the financial markets.

Remember Bernanke has stated numerous times the financial system depends on confidence of the participants. China loudly stated their lack of confidence last week.

When Joe Six-Packs realizes that the Federal Reserve Note is not even secured by US treasuries and or the FED has real tangible assets, but its balance sheet is littered with junks and toxic waste, there will be a run on the Fed i.e. when Americans and foreigners no longer have faith in the Federal Reserve Notes as “money”.

Nouriel Roubini declared:

The process of socializing the private losses from this crisis has already moved many liabilities of the private sector onto the books of the sovereign. At some point a sovereign bank may crack, in which case the ability of the government to credibly commit to act as a backstop for the financial system – including deposit guarantees – could come unglued.

In my opinion, the Fed has already become “unglued”. Whatever guarantees given to secure the indebtedness of CitiGroup and others to prevent a run on these banks are useless.

What Will the End Game Look Like?

Minnesota National Guard Soldiers with the 1st Combined Arms Battalion, 194th Armor stand guard to assist police in maintaining order during demonstration Sept. 1, in St. Paul, Minn. The demonstrators were protesting during day one of the Republican National Convention. (Photo: Master Sgt. Edwin Holt)

David Rockefeller, Jr. and his contemporaries at the Bilderberg, Council on Foreign Relations, and Trilateral Commission want to see their global banking monopoly solidify before they die. These are internationalists working to destroy nation-state identity. The daily operations of these groups is to marginalize all threats against the power Elite.

In 2002 David Rockefeller, Sr. authored his autobiography Memoirs and states:

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

And what they’ve been working on has been taking too long to materialize. Therefore expect a large 9/11 type catalytic event that will use shock doctrine to force compliance. Failure of any of the key central banks would also bring this about.

We will probably see the emergence of a stronger police state in the U.S. if their propaganda methods, like using Bernanke on CBS, continue to fail. We already saw mass arrests made during the RNC and DNC. And we’ve seen wave after wave of protests moving west out of Eastern Europe. Some people look at this as class warfare between the Haves and the Have-Nots. It is possible their accelerated plans will cause a new Sons of Liberty movement in the U.S. where a power struggle between an enlightened citizenry and the corrupt will take place. The reality is Earth has finite resources with exponential population growth. Something inevitably has to give under the current scarcity based system.

The United States House of Representatives has met in closed session seven times since 1825. The most recent closed session was held on March 13th of 2008 to discuss classified details of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Program during debate on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008.

Rumors leaked from that session warn of civil unrest, financial collapse, and protective measures for members of Congress. Several members have since spoken out against bully tactics and threats used by Paulson. He warned members of Congress that if the bailout bill wasn’t passed the U.S. would face total economic collapse and civil riots.

Another current issue to understand is the move to change the Posse Comitatus Act. After the U.S. Civil War it was illegal for the federal government to use the military for law enforcement. This stems from the British occupation and garrisoning of troops in civilian homes during the American Revolutionary War. After the LA Riots and Hurricane Katrina there have been power struggles to allow the U.S. Military to act as law enforcement on domestic soil. These have been thwarted, but there is a new concerning development. From the Army Times:

Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.

But this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities.

They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.

From the ACLU on the U.S. Army’s domestic deployment:

Well, you need to start with the Posse Comitatus Act, enacted in 1878 and it actually makes it a crime for the military to perform civilian functions within the country, unless there’s an explicit act of Congress.

As they say, it’s a slippery slope, and once you start going down the path of having the military deployed in the U.S. it gets harder to draw the limit. And again, it’s not the military, it’s the way that the military might be used by people to avoid certain protections, and certain civil liberties — for example, crowd control is an example how this could be used — how it could be wielded in ways that are dangerous, and that’s why it’s important to, before you take any step, so we know what the threat is, because it’s hard to go back once the line has been eroded.

This line of thinking might seem paranoid, and sure that could be the case. However, these are very real possibilities. The global financial system is closer than it’s ever been to a system wide collapse. For investors it’s probably wise to heed the grey line in Picture of the Year.

Sources:

China’s Leader Says He Is ‘Worried’ Over U.S. Treasuries
The New York Times March 13, 2009
CBS newsman’s $70m lawsuit likely to deal Bush legacy a new blow
The Observer, Sunday 28 December 2008
Ben Bernanke’s Greatest Challenge
Fed Chairman Discusses Recession, Financial Rescues And Recovery In Wide-Ranging 60 Minutes Interview
March 15, 2009
The Federal Reserve is Bankrupt
How Did It Happen and What are the Ugly Consequences?
by Matthias Chang
ACLU on the U.S. Army’s domestic deployment
Monday Oct. 27, 2008
As America Collapses US Government Secret Plans Revealed
Posted by indglass on May 21, 2008
BofA CEO Lewis: Bank Will Not Need More TARP Funds
By: Maria Bartiromo, Anchor | 06 Feb 2009
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/paulson-meet-us-bank-heads/story.aspx?guid={C3A179AE-940F-44DB-B3E5-434EFC87D1EA}
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/meltdown/etc/script.html
https://www.gpcresearch.ml.wallst.com/common/emaillink/pdf.asp?SSS_33E1CD86723A60F4C774F41FC5F2027E&pdf=pdf/Bernanke_buys_bonds.pdf
David A. Rosenberg
Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 1
Army Times, Sep 30, 2008

Here are two primers:
Timeline: Argentina’s Road to Ruin
Timeline: Argentina’s economic crisis

Argentina Crisis Documentary
Fernando Solanas made the following brilliant documentary: Memorias del saqueo. He is a very outspoken critic of the Menem government which drove Argentina into financial collapse. Solanas was shot and wounded in 1991 a day after he publicly criticised Argentina’s elite. This was way before the peak of their financial crisis and riots in 2001. The complete video series can be found here. Listen to his warning:

Raid the Pensioners

Today in the United States there are many grandmothers wondering about their future and if they will have any money left to live out the remainder of their lives. Many pensioners in Argentina were wiped out. Again, remember Enron and how people were convinced to jump on board based on a giant lie. In Argentina they were told to trust Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase. One of the concepts to understand is how we are manipulated by international corporations and central banks. They force governments (and wage slaves) to borrow heavily to curb inflation, drive themselves into major debt, credit is then squeezed to pay the debt, and the economy collapses. Then they really own you. The credit squeeze was so severe for Argentina the country sold its prime assets often at 10% of fair value. Sound familiar?

The market was crashed then monopolized. The same thing is happening in the US right now. Twenty-six corporations owned 60% of Argentina’s wealth. In a deregulated environment they were able to produce triple the profits of similar companies outside Argentina. All at the expense of the citizenry, half of them driven out of their jobs. This is crime on a massive scale that causes thousands of poverty related deaths a year. None of the men prosecuted for these crimes were found guilty.

Meet Domingo

One of the men responsible was Domingo Cavallo. Like Bernanke he is a Harvard educated economist turned crisis manager. He belongs to the Group of Thirty along with Bernanke’s mentor Stanley Fischer and the NY Fed’s president Timothy Geithner. Cavallo was President of the Central Bank of Argentina, and Minister of Economy during the 2001 collapse. He instituted the policy of corralito which limited bank cash withdrawals to $250/week. He also increased the debt Argentina owed the IMF which drove the country further into misery. After he resigned and got out of jail for international weapons trafficking he came to the US to teach economics at Harvard University.

While at Harvard, in the Spring of 2004, he wrote a really fascinating article for the Council on Foreign Relations. Here are some amazing excerpts from Argentina and the IMF During the Two Bush Administrations:

My intention in writing this article is to point out how damaging the current US vision of the world and style of leadership in international affairs can be, not only for the climate of friendship and sense of alliance between the USA and its southern neighbours, but also for the well-being of the people of Latin America…

I do support the view that the policies of the administration of George H. W. Bush (‘Bush 41’) created incentives for countries that wanted to embrace the US-led new world order and offered a window of opportunity to solve crises and renew economic growth…

Nonetheless, I do support the view that the lack of commitment of the administration of George W. Bush (‘Bush 43’) with the new world order and the lack of US leadership in international finance contributed more than any other factor to discredit Market Capitalism, and pushed the country back into the ideas and practices of Nationalism and Statism…

The origins of the Argentinian crisis that became virulent in 2001–02 can be traced back to the long lasting recession that started in the second half of 1998. This recession was the result of the combination of domestic phenomena and foreign shocks.

The main domestic phenomenon was the lack of fiscal discipline of the Argentinian provincial governments and their heavy borrowing from the domestic banking system. This problem became acute in 1998 as a consequence of the internal race for the Peronist Party presidential nomination for the elections that would take place in 1999. In addition, there was a growing perception of corruption regarding Menem’s ways, which started to create uncertainty in relation to the continuity of the economic reforms…

By July 2001 what Argentina needed and expected from the US government was political support for an orderly process of debt restructuring. Unfortunately, the vision and style of leadership in international affairs of President George W. Bush prevented his administration from delivering this support.

As a counterfactual guess, I would argue that, if President George W. Bush had had the same vision and style of leadership in international affairs as his father, the outcome would have been completely different. Argentina and Argentinians would not be blaming market capitalism and the IMF for their suffering. Moreover, the climate of friendship and alliance of the 1990s in the bilateral relationship between Argentina and the USA would not have been reversed…

But we became alarmed and started to worry about what could be a significant change of vision and style of leadership in international affairs when, in July 2001, Paul O’Neill stated that ‘Argentines have been off and on in trouble for 70 years or more. They don’t have any export industry to speak of at all. And they like it that way. Nobody forced them to be what they are.’ A few days later he added: ‘And Argentina is now, after the $41 billion intervention, in a very slippery position. We’re working to find a way to create a sustainable Argentina, not just one that continues to consume the money of the plumbers and carpenters in the USA who make $50,000 a year and wonder what in the world we’re doing with their money.’

Blame Joe or the NWO?

So the concept of Joe the Plumber has been around for a while. Does it seem incredulous that Cavallo is blaming the very system he supports? He is essentially saying Argentina’s banking system failed because it was designed to be supported by the US which is an ally of the NWO. Some will argue the United States is pushing forward a New World Order. Don’t be mistaken. The plans of the NWO are based on a globalized banking structure that has no national allegiance. This is key to understanding the potential collapse of the US banking system. American money won’t disappear, it will be redistributed to the Elite. What will disappear is our standard of living, but not theirs.

Here is an incredible footnote from that document:

See the Report of the International Financial Institutions Advisory Commission, March 2000. Available at http://www.house.gov/jec/imf.ifiac.htm. In page 27 it says: ‘1994–95: The Mexican Crisis. The 1994–1995 Mexican crisis is seen by many as a watershed in the history of the ‘‘new’’ international monetary system and the ‘‘new’’ IMF. It raised important questions about the effectiveness of IMF assistance in preventing such crises. Mexico had been the largest single recipient of IMF credit during the six years leading up to the crash of the Mexican peso in December 1994. With its loans it received frequent advice, conditions, and visits by IMF officials and staff. After the crisis, the IMF approved an eighteen-month standby credit worth $17.8 billion, the largest financial package ever granted a member state and one clearly beyond the borrowing limits that the IMF had always maintained. The US Treasury offered to provide up to $20 billion in additional funds through its Exchange Stabilization Fund and the Federal Reserve’s swap network. According to the General Accounting Office (GAO), Mexico eventually used some $13 million of IMF money and $13.5 billion of US official funds. The Mexican program established several bad precedents. Congress had shown that it opposed a large expenditure to aid Mexico. The Treasury used the Exchange Stabilization Fund to circumvent the Congressional budget process. And the IMF circumvented established procedures for approving loans and limiting their size in relation to the borrower’s IMF quota. The IMF and the US Treasury view the Mexican bailout as a success.

Here is evidence of foreknowledge the crisis management team knew a crash was coming and allowed it to happen. This is from Gary Aguirre (SEC whistleblower see story) who was fired for investigating John Mack prior to his CEO appointment at Morgan Stanley.

Gary Aguirre memo to Senate Banking Feb. 13, 2008

Courtesy of: InvestigatetheSEC.com:

GARY J. AGUIRRE
By Facsimile or Electronic Mail

February 13,2008

Senator Christopher Dodd
Chairman
United States Senate Committee on
Banking, Housing and urban Affairs
728 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Senator Richard C. Shelby
Ranking Member
United States Senate Committee on
Banking, Housing and urban Affairs
110 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Re: Hearing on the of State of the United States Economy and Financial Markets

Dear Chairman Dodd and Ranking Member Shelby:

As the current credit crisis unfolds, investors and the public must rely upon your Committee to uncover its causes and scope. Your hearing on Thursday, The State of the United States Economy and Financial Markets, offers an opportunity to question those regulators who are responsible for protecting the capital markets from this evolving crisis. I respectfully submit there are two key questions that penetrate to the core ofthis crisis:

1) Why did counterparty discipline fail?

2) Why did the SEC stop an investigation three years ago that could have averted the subprime crisis?

I will try to put these questions into sharper focus with the context below.

In essence, the nation has two capital markets: one market is semi-transparent and semiregulated; the other market is opaque and unregulated. The semi transparent market appears on balance sheets. It is subject to SEC regulations requiring disclosure. It includes investment banks and public companies that regularly file SEC forms disclosing their financial operations.

The opaque market has its own players and its own playing field. The players are hedge funds-also unregulated and opaque-and the proprietary desks of investments banks. As investment banks own more and more hedge funds, their players also become unregulated and opaque. The playing field is the over-the-counter derivatives and instruments, such as subprime debt, which are off the balance sheets.

The opaque market is experiencing geometric growth. The notional value of the derivative market has increased fivefold since 2003, from around $100 trillion to over $500 trillion. Likewise, hedge funds are having the same geometric growth in assets under management and in sheer numbers. The SEC predicts the assets under managements by hedge funds will grow from $2 trillion to $6 trillion by 2015. Hedge funds currently dominate the trading markets around the world-with only $2 trillion in assets. It is hard to envision the extent to which they will control the markets when their assets grow to $6 trillion, all operating in the shadows.

Hedge funds love to play with the most dangerous forms of derivatives-credit default swaps (CDS). There are now $42 trillion in CDS. These guarantees differ little from gambling. The potential rewards for insider trading are nearly unlimited, as is the negative impact on the capital markets.

After the Great Crash, Congress enacted legislation designed to make our markets transparent. The same legislation created the Securities and Exchange Commission. As money flows from the regulated market to the unregulated market, we are now recreating the conditions that existed immediately before the Great Crash.

The investment banks and hedge funds have come up with a new principle for protecting the capital markets. It is called counterparty discipline. Translated, it means: “Trust us.” The term is tossed around as if it were natural law in the financial markets, much like gravity in the physical world. In reality, counterparty discipline is a slogan, a myth, which has been sold to regulators by investment banks and hedge funds so they can operate in the shadows without regulation.

We hear about counterparty discipline during Congressional hearings from those who wish the opaque, unregulated markets to grow. During financial crises, the same folks talk less about “counterparty discipline.” Indeed, we are only told that it “eroded” without explanation why.

In fact, the theory of counterparty discipline reverses reality. When the markets are moving upward, optimism is high. It is a cliche, but nevertheless true, that upward trading markets are driven by greed. All of our major investment banks, with the possible exception of Goldman Sachs, failed to detect that subprime debt was a time bomb. Why did counterparty discipline fail the investment banks in their moment of need? I respectfully submit this question should be posed to the three regulators who are testifying on Thursday.

Over the past two months, the Wall Street journal, the New York Times, Reuters, CNBC and Forbes have all asked a single question: where was the SEC on subprime debt? Significantly, three years ago, the SEC was conducting an investigation that could have averted the subprime crisis. The investigation focused on Bear Stearns’ evaluation of subprime debt, the core issue in the current crisis. The investigation reached a point where Bear Stearns was told it would be charged. Then, for no known reason, the investigation was switched off. A recent Wall Street Journal article suggests that the effective prosecution of the Bear Steams case might have averted the subprime crises.

The Bear Steams investigation is stunningly similar to the SEC investigation of Pequot Capital Management which I headed. Like Bear Steams, the Pequot investigation appeared to be advancing towards a filing. Like Bear Steams, senior SEC management decided to halt the investigation. Like Bear Steams, the SEC was later forced to focus on the underlying abuse, but only after that abuse grabbed media attention. In Bear Steams, the underlying abuse was overvalued subprime debt. In Pequot, the underlying abuse was widespread insider trading by hedge funds.

We know why the Pequot investigation was stopped. According to a joint report by the Senate Judiciary and Finance Committees, a major investment bank, Morgan Stanley, retained an influential attorney who intervened at the highest level of the Division of Enforcement to stop the investigation. The two Senate committees concluded that senior SEC officials gave preferential treatment to a member of Wall Street’s elite and then fired the lead investigator (me) when he questioned that decision. None of the senior SEC officials who derailed the Pequot investigation were ever disciplined. Was the Bear Steams investigation stopped in a similar way? Did another influential attorney, hired by Bear Steams, place a call to a high-level official at the SEC?

Your Committee has oversight jurisdiction of the SEC. The SEC’s mission is to protect the capital markets and investors. It had a chance to protect the capital markets from the current subprime crisis three years ago, when it was investigating whether Bear Steams overvalued subprime debt. Why did the SEC call a halt to the Bear Steams investigation? Who made that decision?

Sincerely,

Gary J. Aguirre

CC: Members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and urban Affairs.

1 Michael Siconolfi, Did Authorities Miss a Chance To Ease Crunch?–SEC, Spitzer Probed
Bear CDO Pricing in ’05, Before Backing Away, Wall S1.J., Dec. 10, 2007, at C1.
2 Id.; Gretchen Morgenson, 0 Wise Bank, What Do We Do? (No Fibbing Now), N. Y. times,
January 27, 2008, at 1; Karey Wutkowski, SEC Chief Awaits Final Senate Report on Pequot,
Reuters News, February 9, 2007; http://www.cnbc.com/id/22706231/site/14081545/; and Liz
Moyer, Credit Crisis: Where Was The SEC? Forbes.com, Feb. 6,2008. Available at
http://www.forbes.com/2008/02/05/ sec-cmos-banking-biz-wall-cx 1m 0206sec.html.
3 Michael Siconolfi, Did Authorities Miss a Chance To Ease Crunch?–SEC, Spitzer Probed
Bear CDO Pricing in ’05, Before Backing Away, Wall S1.J., Dec. 10,2007, at Cl.
4Id.
5 Senate Report No. 110-28 (2007), at 684 Available at
http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/leg/LEG%202007 /Leg%20 110%20080307%20SEC.pdf.

May you live in interesting times
May you come to the attention of those in authority
May you find what you are looking for
-Ancient Chinese Curse

This is part one in series of articles that will explore the big picture and drive towards the purpose behind the “crisis” in the financial world. Our goal is to better understand how we are being manipulated, marginalized, and controlled. These theories need polish so please be patient with me as I dig for the truth.

Deregulate and Crash

So what is the truth behind the global market meltdown? We are approaching the end of the monetary system as we know it. All our hard work and belief in laws designed to protect us and our savings have been compromised, deregulated, and sold to the benefit of a few corporations. Think Enron for banks. Remember Senator Phil Gramm from our last story? He’s the guy who deregulated California’s energy trading market which put PG&E into bankruptcy. Thousands of people’s retirement money was vaporized. He has done the same thing to the banking industry. Even more retirement money is being destroyed right now.

Logic dictates the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few or the one. However, this is not true for people in the Elite ruling class. They own you.

The mainstream media will not discuss the root cause for several reasons. One, their job is to protect the illusion of a democracy that supports a free market economy. Two, the media is owned by corporations benefiting from wage slavery. Three, truth can lead to civil disobedience en masse and there are not enough FEMA detention centers for that. If you are not aware of these facilities please look it up. The government can legally use the US military to arrest you and detain you.

Working hypothesis (to be further explored):

• Crisis has been engineered to monopolize the global free markets.
• Crisis has been used to push fascist legislation through the US Congress.
• The Treasury Secretary has unprecedented power with no oversight or transparency.
• A group with connections to the Bilderbergs and Council on Foreign Relations is working to centralize world currency and banking.
• Our fiat money system is near systemic collapse as the US dollar approaches a reserve valuation of $0.00.
• All major outstanding US debts are being nationalized.
• The goal is to nationalize all debt, create a vehicle to service the debt, then destroy the vehicle.
• *That vehicle could be the US Federal Reserve System.

Who Are the Puppet Masters?
Here are some key members of the Bilderbergs managing the US credit crisis (from the Official 2008 Bilderberg Participant List):

Alexander, Keith B. Director, National Security Agency
Bernanke, Ben S. Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System
Daschle, Thomas A. Former US Senator and Senate Majority Leader
Geithner, Timothy F. President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Gigot, Paul Editorial Page Editor, The Wall Street Journal
Graham, Donald E. Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
Paulson, Jr., Henry M. Secretary of the Treasury
Rice, Condoleezza Secretary of State
Rockefeller, David Former Chairman, Chase Manhattan Bank
Rose, Charlie Producer, Rose Communications
Schmidt, Eric Chairman of the Executive Committee and CEO, Google
Wolfowitz, Paul Visiting Scholar, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

Listen to a BBC story on the group.

The point of highlighting these individuals is to show key players who are compromised and leveraged. They had foresight of the impending collapse, are on record for being warned about it, and have kept silent. This is key to understanding why the collapse was engineered and for what purpose.

Like a game of musical chairs banks are being removed from the party and soon the music will stop. The failure of the current banking system could be used as a reason to enforce a new global regulatory body. This body might be a reincarnated version of the Federal Reserve System with greater centralized power. The Fed was initially created in secret meetings by powerful old money families at Jekyll Island, just like the Bilderbergs met in secret last June.

This type of future should conjure images of Orwell’s 1984, Bladerunner, and Minority Report. We all have the authority to stop this. We don’t deserve to be owned by a banking corporation that uses our own money to subvert our civic freedoms.

How Far Can a Dollar Go?

There is a theoretical ceiling on debt and leverage that can be entered into the money supply. Many banks traditionally are supposed to maintain a 10% reserve. For example (from Wikipedia):

Reserve requirements affect the potential of the banking system to create transaction deposits. If the reserve requirement is 10%, for example, a bank that receives a $100 deposit may lend out $90 of that deposit. If the borrower then writes a check to someone who deposits the $90, the bank receiving that deposit can lend out $81. As the process continues, the banking system can expand the change in excess reserves of $90 into a maximum of $1,000 of money ($100+$90+81+$72.90+…=$1,000), e.g.$100/0.10=$1,000.

The solution presented to Congress is to exacerbate this problem by creating more debt, which can theoretically lead to complete failure. I’m not a banker or economist, so please help enlighten me if this is wrong.

This is a great review of the history of US currency:

Where is Money Going?

Our current fiat money system is based on scarcity which has created competition, greed, and war. If it is designed to fail it won’t matter where you put your money. Gold ownership can also be outlawed, as it was with the Gold Confiscation Order:

It required all persons to deliver on or before May 1, 1933 all gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates owned by them to the Federal Reserve. Under the Trading With the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, as amended on March 9, 1933, violation of Executive Order 6102 was punishable by fine up to $10,000 ($166,640 if adjusted for inflation as of 2008) or up to ten years in prison, or both. Because of this forced immediate sale of gold to the Federal Reserve at the government set price of $20.67 per ounce, this Executive Order is often referred to as the Gold Confiscation of 1933. Shortly after this forced sale, the price of gold from the treasury for international transactions was raised to $35 an ounce; the U.S. government thereby devalued the U.S. dollar by 41%. This price remained until August 15, 1971 when President Richard Nixon announced that the United States would no longer convert dollars to gold at a fixed value, thus abandoning the gold standard.

The system could finally crumble along with mass disillusionment. People will then realize all their time and effort securing money, or a safe future, was completely futile.

Please watch the following documentary. It’s one of the best you’ll ever see. Zeitgeist Addendum beautifully explains how money is created and the critical flaws of this system:

In the long run this could be the greatest thing to happen to modern civilization. It could lead to the end of wage slavery. Or it could lead to a stronger police state. It probably won’t happen this year or next year, but we’re closer than we’ve ever been. Ending the debt-based monetary system depends on the overall consciousness of the world’s citizens.

People have to wake up and stop enabling the system. Every $1,000 in your bank account is leveraged into $10,000 to build out the US Empire. People need to stop blindly supporting the military. The US no longer has a citizen army. Think Vietnam dissention. We have what Noam Chomsky calls, “A mercenary army of the disadvantaged.” This army is key to an expanding empire. The Elite will not allow citizens to interfere with global monopoly. Watch the Battle in Seattle for proof. The Elite will soon push for the Amero or some other form of credit, which will lead to a more aggressive police state.

The Future for US Citizens?

We haven’t seen any serious bankruptcies yet, which should eventually come in waves as all the credit/debt unwinds. We might see this in a few months. The media is ignoring this very real possibility. It is the Fed which is preventing massive bankruptcies. How long can their shell game continue through artificial support of a corrupt monetary system?

When more people realize how they have been abused by a system that is run by an Elite class, at the expense of the majority, they will demonstrate.

Here is how a local government recently prepared for peaceful protesters:

The “Battle in Seattle” WTO Ministerial Conference of 1999: